Showing posts with label LED. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LED. Show all posts

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Nobel Prize 2014 : Chemistry Front Runners & Winners



Dear Readers 

December is upon us and there is a sense of excitement, a sensation of general electricity in the air and about each and every one of us. Perhaps it’s the rush of serotonin from the expectation of the upcoming Christmas celebrations or better yet the utter thrill of participating in the Feast of Winter Veil. Aahhh the memories, it truly is a time for remembrance, reminiscing and rejoice. 

But apart from the solstice festivities I am reminded of yet another event that is a combination of December, serotonin and remembrance. Yes! The 2014 Nobel Prize ceremonies are just around the corner and I am left with the recapitulation of the Chemistry awards to complete the holy trinity of Nobel prizes, for 2014.

And before you say it I am fully aware that I left out the other two awards , but the sole purpose of this omission is due the fact that I wanted to create some controversy before I started the article, and I daresay …….……………people have better things to worry about.

CHEMISTRY












 Ching W. Tang and Steven Van Slyke: Organic Light emitting 
diode 

 It was truly a “Kodak moment” (a reference I’m sure will be missed by the younger generation) when Ching W. Tang and Steven Van Slyke, whilst working at Eastman Kodak Research laboratories, published a paper unveiling  their experiments using electricity to  activate organic chemicals  so that they  generate light ,in a process that was quite energy efficient.


Praise and citations (over 9000!!!!!!! for their papers released in 1980s) followed suit this revolutionary technology which changed the very landscape of electroluminescence. 

A template of the diode would consist of two layers of different semi conductor organic materials squashed in between two electrodes which emitted light when a small charge was passed through the system. This needed far less power (10V) than previous versions of electroluminescent diodes (100V).

As illustrated in the diagram the first layer would be the cathode, magnesium/silver alloy was originally used by the duo. Next came the luminescent or emissive layer of tris (8-hydroxyquinolato) aluminum (Alq3) which was followed by a conductive layer of a diamine. The Anode layer of indium tin oxide would be last. All the layers are deposited, in very thin films, on a substrate usually glass or plastic. 

The reaction when a current is passed through the diode, instigating freed delocalized electrons of the Alq3 to come into contact with the holes of the diamine layer, is the sole cause of its incandescence. Ching and Steven’s rudimentary version, which had a luminous intensity peak of 550nm, visibly representing green, was improved upon by the use of better organic polymer layers and improved electrodes to host the full scope of the color spectrum. 

The appliance of OLEDs can be seen the world over, from your TV screen, to your mobile display, to your camera and even to your hand held game consoles. The innumerable applications of their invention earn the duo a well deserved nomination as they kick start our list.

Steven Van Slyke (right) and Ching W.Tang (left)
 


Charles T. Kresge, Ryong Ryoo, Galen D. Stucky: Modeling Mesoporous Materials 

There are three types of nanoporous mediums, macro (pore size: 50–1000 nm), meso (pore size: 2–50 nm) and micro (pore size: 0.2–2 nm).  Mesoporous materials are considered bulk materials with large internal surface areas of up to 1000 m2/g. Compounds of silica and alumina are the more common mesoporous materials. Their applications range from catalysis, sorption, ion exchanges, optics, photovoltaics, for use in bio-sensors and as molecular sieves.

Charles Kreger
It was Charles Kreger who first demonstrated that such materials could be fabricated and customized in a laboratory, receiving more than 11,500 citations for his paper in Nature publications. The key to his innovative creation process was the use of surfactants, a compound that reduces surface tension of liquids. It was surrounding the resultant micelle; formed from the inclusion of surfactants in its synthesis, that the aluminum silicates grow. The size of the pores depended upon the molecular structure of the surfactant used. 

Ryong Ryoo
Using this process Kreger synthesized several types of mesoporous materials (MCM-36, MCM-56, MCM-67, MCM-68) the most famous of which is MCM -41(Mobil composition of matter No. 41). 

MCM 41’s most notable predicted application is as a drug delivery system for a cytotoxin to attack cancer cells. 

Enter Ryoo, not the Hadouken hurling Japanese street fighter but rather the award winning Korean chemistry professor. His research at KAIST University focused on mesoporous carbon, specifically on a hard templating synthesis strategy where mesoporous silica were used as scaffolding around which were built carbon based structures. The silica template was later removed leaving a framework of 3nm carbon mesotubes or mesopores (which was later found out to be tunable to twice that size). 
Galen D Stucky

Mesoporous carbon has several applications especially in the area of fuel cell engineering serving as a catalyst support for platinum nanoparticles, used to enhance the rate of half reactions in a fuel cell. 

Additionally the fabrication process itself offers a smart new synthesis strategy applicable to other nanoporous materials. 

Dr. Galen D. Stucky of the infamous Stucky group demonstrated how hexagonal mesostructures with 7nm -30nm pores could be fabricated. Thus was born the Santa Barbara Amophorous No.15 named after the University of California. SBA 15 is used as a drug delivery system especially for poorly water soluble drugs and it is also used as a biosensor.

 For their contributions to the fabrication, customization and improving of the functionality of mesoporous materials, not to mention their future implications and applications, these gentlemen are more than worthy of the illustrious Nobel.

 
Graeme Moad,Ezio Rizzardo and San H. Thang: RAFT Polymerization


From paints to plastics to plates to cups to carbon fiber to rubber to adhesives, Polymers are core components of most of the current technology we see around us.  As such their synthesis, known as polymerization, has become a vital part of modern industry.   Polymer use and synthesis date back to over 70 years; however in the 1990s three chemists working at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) centre in Clayton, Melbourne in the land down under, blew previous polymerization techniques asunder. 

Their work particularly revolved around solving the controllability issue of the radical polymerization process which was used to produce polymers such as polyacrylate, polyacrylonitrile, polystyrene, and polyvinyl acetate. This was one of the more direct techniques and involved using a free radical molecule to initiate a repetitive chain reaction between monomers so that they bind together to form a polymer. Alas this repetitive chain reaction’s termination was unpredictable and the entire polymerization process, if not monitored, was found to be extremely hazardous. 

After much research Graeme, Ezio (not from Assassin’s creed) and San discovered that they could control the radical polymerization by introducing a transfer agent in the form of a thiocarbonylthio compound that offered versatility to the process. This transfer agent allowed the control and manipulation of the generated molecular weight and the dispersity of the polymer. It also enabled reversibility. This is due to the fragmentation reaction that occurs resulting in either the starting polymeric species or a radical and a polymeric transfer agent from which the radical or the polymer species can be removed to essentially reverse the process.  Hence the trio named the process “Reversible Addition-Fragmentation chain Transfer” or RAFT. 

San H Thang (left), Ezzio Rizzardo (middle) and Graeme Moad (right)
RAFT polymerization made way for the synthesis of a variety of polymer types with complex architectures, controlled molecular weight and low dispersity. The flexibility it offers allowed the meshing of a wide blend of monomers to make co-polymers and also enabled the process to be conducted in a range of solvents without any temperature restrictions. 

For their development upon the radical polymerization process by introducing, to the world, the RAFT synthesis system these gentlemen earn a laudable nomination to join the ranks of the Nobel laureates. 

Kenichi Honda and Akira Fujishima: Water photolysis

Photolysis refers to the breaking down of a compound with the use of photons; this is most commonly seen in photosynthesis as water is oxygenated to form two hydrogen atoms and a diatomic oxygen molecule which is released into the air. Plants, thylakoids of cyanobacteria and the chloroplasts of green algae naturally use photolysis in the process of creating chemical energy. 

However the recreation of the water photolysis process proved to be difficult as just shining a light did nothing to water. 

It was in 1972 that Akira Fujishima and his mentor, the late, Kenichi Honda devised a simple method to artificially reconstruct this process. They would spilt H2O by incorporating Titanium dioxide as a catalyst and subjecting it to UV light. This process is known as Photocatalysis.

The discovery of the photocatalysis of water has several implications and quite a few applications.
The most obvious and central use is that the hydrogen gas that is formulated offers a clean, renewable and inexpensive source of energy and therefore research is being carried out ,feverishly, to develop practical photochemical hydrogen fuel cells for mass consumption and commercialization. 

Akira Fujishima
Catalysts other than titanium dioxide are being tested to find an effective and efficient way of yielding hydrogen gas however due to the fact that an inordinate supply of input energy is required for the process the main source of hydrogen remains to be natural gas. 

Kenichi Hond
Photocatalysis is also used to disinfect water in a process called Solar water disinfection. Although water disinfection can be done without using a catalyst, recent studies have shown that using such an agent like titanium dioxide augmented the effects of solar irradiation. Even though the process isn’t quite efficient photocatalysis disinfection requires no energy input and the materials involved are quite stable thus maintaining its appeal as a viable process, applicable especially in remote areas. 


Akira and Kenichi’s contribution made way for avenues of research in both the invention of a much needed energy source for the future and the equally needed purification of polluted and infected water. Thus it is only just that they receive their rightful acclamation for the Nobel Prize. 

 
Jacqueline K Barton: DNA ET, Metallo DNA Binding probes, DNA electrochemistry 

To Jacqueline Barton the body was a complex machine with DNA representing its molecular wires. This unorthodox outlook stemmed from being an inorganic chemist and it is this perspective that led her to experiment and examine the interactions between metal complexes and DNA. 

Jacqueline pioneered the application of these organo-metal complexes to probe the “pie” stacked double helix structure of DNA. She synthesized two classes of probes, each designed to interact with DNA in a specific manner. Rhodium complexes would photocleave the sugar phosphate backbone of the DNA near its binding site and Ruthenium complexes would illuminate after binding. Unlike Organic complexes they can be manipulated into different modules integrated with recognition elements. These complexes once intercalated allow for DNA sequence recognition. 

Whilst tuning metal complexes for DNA sequence recognition Barton and her team stumbled upon the capability of certain complexes to recognize single base mismatch pairs. Thus was born a third class of organo-metal complexes, christened metalloinsertors. Using Crystallography and Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) they were able to examine the binding process of metalloinsertors. The sterically expansive ligand of the metalloinsertor would be inserted into the DNA’s minor groove to eject the mismatched pair into the major groove to allow for access. This would be the first ever observation of a small molecule insertion of DNA.  

The applications of the DNA binding probes range from the early detection of cancer and contribution to chemotherapeutics to hampering the proliferation of mismatch repair deficient cells to drug delivery systems.
However this was but only one of her contributions. The next would be aided by the prior discussed research. 

Jacqueline K Barton along with Bernd Giese and Gary B.Schuster conducted the first research to demonstrate that aside from carrying our valuable genetic information DNA is also responsible for the transfer of electrons, for which they earned a Nobel nomination in 2009. 

Electron transfer (ET), as it was acceptably theorized by Nobel winner R.A Marcus and improved upon by N.S. Hush, referred to the quantum mechanics of the redox process wherein electrons are gained by an acceptor molecule (reduction) and lost by a donor molecule (oxidization).There are three main ways in which the transfer can occur. The electron can travel along an established ligand bridge or transition through temporary bridges or circumvent this process and hop straight to its destination. 

 Numerous biological processes, like photosynthesis, were also found to have ET chains and it was experimentally observed that DNA was quite an exceptional medium for the transfer and transportation of electrons. 

Jacqueline likened the double helix Ï€ stacked structure of DNA to a wire, used for long range signaling between proteins in a cell. However DNA frequently gets damaged by the metabolic activity in our bodies and environmental factors such as radiation. In such a scenario signaling will be impaired. These DNA lesions, if you will, are constantly repaired by special proteins synthesized by our cells. Like the late Jedi council the fixer proteins constantly keep in touch through the force (DNA) and actively seek out disturbances (damages) in it. However when repair proteins get corrupted by power and they turn to the dark side entire cells are defiled becoming cancerous. 

Star wars analogy aside this discovery would be a crucial stepping stone to the development of DNA based electrochemistry. 

It was evident that the use of ET as a reporting and signaling system to locate DNA damage and lesions was vital for the operation of DNA repair; however its function is assumed to extend beyond that of the DNA repair process. Transcription factors such as SoxR oxidative stress regulator and p53 related to tumor regulator cells are also believed to use the ET system. 

The Barton Group residing in Caltech are using DNA’s ET system to develop a highly sensitive mode of detecting DNA binding proteins and mRNAs. 

An electrochemical approach they are focusing on is depositing a self assembled monolayer of Thiol modified DNA, inserted with a redox- activate probe, onto a gold surface. The reduction of the redox probe within the DNA enables the analyzing of the DNA’s structure in the section between the gold surface and the probe, to uncover DNA lesions, mismatches and even protein based interactions like DNA base flipping. 

Research is being conducted into incorporating new redox probes and surface passivation strategies to make this a feasible analytic procedure for the detection of protein and mRNA. The development of a gold multiplex chip to conduct several DNA analysis simultaneously with the least amount of sample preparation holds great promise in the field of pathology detection, especially for exposing cancer transcription factors. 

Jacqueline K Barton


For her continous efforts and contributions, which are products of her daring outlook and ideals on DNA, Prof.Jacqueline Barton deserves approbation and acclamation and a nomination for the Nobel Prize. 


The winners of 2014 Nobel Prize in Chemistry 

Eric Betzig, Stefan W. Hell and William E. Moerner: super-resolved fluorescence microscopy

“For a long time optical microscopy was held back by a presumed limitation: that it would never obtain a better resolution than half the wavelength of light. Helped by fluorescent molecules the Nobel Laureates in Chemistry 2014 ingeniously circumvented this limitation. Their ground-breaking work has brought optical microscopy into the nanodimension” ~NobelPrize.org

This beyond revolutionary advancement ushered in the age of observable, optical nanoscopy sending shockwaves throughout the fields of biology.  

The journey began with Prof.Stefan Hell who upon the finishing his Ph D embarked on a quest to prove the infamous Abbe wrong. No, it wasn’t the 16th president of the United States that he wanted to challenge but Professor Ernst Abbe, who in 1973, set in stone, the law of limited resolution. It stated that the observation of objects smaller than 0.2 micrometers (half the wave length of light) was pure ludicrous. However after watching the Ten commandments we all know what happens to laws written in stone. 


Stefan Hell
But as all rebels do, he was met with harsh admonishment, cold discouragement and many an obstacle, which made him finally decide to leave Germany. So it was that the ambitious young Stefan Hell found himself in Turku where he was taken in by a scientist, working on fluorescence microscopy, and asked to join his research team. Whilst laboring in the library of the University of Turku, he stumbled upon a tome titled “Quantum Optics” and in it he would find his first guiding muse “stimulated emission”

Fluorescence microscopy involved using fluorescent molecules (e.g. antibodies) to join with cellular components (DNA) for imaging purposes. This enables scientists to see where the component is located however its resolution, or lack thereof, prevented clear observation of small molecules.

After reading about stimulated emission he noted that in a state of population inversion, it could optically amplify the incoming light due to its ability to reduce the energy of excited molecules thus creating photons with the same phase, frequency, polarization, and direction of travel as its source incident wave.

It dawned on Stefan Hell that incorporating stimulated emission into fluorescence microscopy would essentially provide the answer he sought.

One light to fluoresese them all
Another to quench them
Two lights to find them all
and in the darkness clarify them

In 1994 he published a paper proposing a method where two light pulses were to be used, one to excite all molecules and then the second to extinguish fluorescence in all molecules but the ones left in a nanometer sized gap in the middle which would be imaged. By carefully scanning the sample, nanometer by nanometer, a detailed image can be modeled. Its significance was that the resolution depended on the amount of fluorescence registered at a given point thus rendering resolution essentially limitless.   

He dubbed his method Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) and in the wake of Y2K managed to successfully image an E.Coli Bacterium with resolution unattainable by a regular microscope.  However, unbeknownst to Stefan Hell, other forces were at work trying to achieve the same goal; although in a quite a different manner. 

The year was 1989; In an IBM research center in San Jose California, W.E Moerner became the first scientist to measure the light absorption of a single molecule. All chemical experiments were to that point conducted by observing a collection of molecules from which a mean was derived to represent a standard molecule. Moerner’s breakthrough meant that chemists could now use techniques to assess single molecules thus improving our understanding of molecular chemistry. 

As fate would have it Professor Moerner moved to San Diego, in 1997, to join the University of California, right about the time when upcoming Nobel Laureate Roger Tsien was meddling about with his discovery, the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) that he extracted from a jellyfish. He was trying to make the protein fluoresce with colours other than green. What was fascinating about GFP was that, when bound to other proteins in a cell, it would make them visible, acting as a marker system with which the location of a bound protein could be observed. 

Moerner was intrigued by this and experimented with GFP. He found a variant of it which could essentially be switched on and off by subjecting it to a specific light wave length. After initial excitation, at 488nm wavelength, it would eventually fade away, but would only be reactivated at the wavelength of 405nm.
In an experiment he scattered these proteins in a gel, at intervals larger than Abbe’s diffraction limit and found that it was indeed possible to observe single molecules that fluoresce through an optical microscope. Moerner likened them to optically controllable little lamps and published his findings in Nature publications, 1997, which landed in the hands of Eric Betzig. 

Eric Betzig had managed to already surpass Abbe’s law by the start of the 1990s. He used a thin tip placed only a few nanometers away from the specimen surface to emit light in a method called near field microscopy.

However near field microscopy could not visualize anything below the sample surface and it was soon evident that it could not be improved further. Depressed he quit his research career at Bell labs, yet Abbe’s diffraction law still haunted his mind.

Perhaps it was the chill of that winter’s day but something sparked a thought in his mind. Whilst working on his near field microscopy, the exploits of other scientists particularly one W.E Moerner had compelled him to observe a fluorescent molecule using his special microscope. A query formed in his mind whether the use of fluorescent molecules of different colors could possibly enable him to circumvent the diffraction law using a regular microscope. 

He formulated an answer by suggesting that fluorescent molecules of different colours, possibly red, green and yellow, be spread out in intervals of distances greater than Abbe’s 0.2 micrometers limit. A microscope would be set to register one image per colour and all images when superimposed would give a high resolution image where single molecules, due to their distance apart and different colours, could be observed. He published his theory in the journal of Optics Letters, but still wasn’t ready to return to the world of research and academia.  

It was during this time that he came across literature about the GFP. It renewed his passion for research since now; the possibility of implementing his theory was within his grasp. However it was in 2005 that the fruition of its implementation grew ever closer, with Betzig’s discovery of a protein,similar to the one Moerner found, that could be optically controlled. This led to the revamping of his hypothesis as it wasn’t necessary for the fluorescent molecules to possess different colours anymore; they just had to fluoresce at different times. 

His 11 year long wait was rewarded in 2006 as he, along with other scientists working with fluorescent proteins, demonstrated the applicability of his theory. They used a weak light pulse to temporarily excite small groups of fluorescent proteins (which were spaced at distances greater than 0.2micrometers) at a time, per image. The superimposition of these images gave them a detailed comprehensive and high resolution image which shattered Abe’s law of diffraction. His victory was final once he published his work in Science publications. 


Our epic trio still continues to tirelessly strive for progress, as they spearhead research in the field of 
nanoscopy. Their contributions resulted in the techniques of nanoscopy used around the globe. Stefan hell himself has seen the inside of a living nerve cell and looked upon brain synapses. W.E. Moerner has examined proteins related to Huntington’s disease. Eric Betzig has witnessed the wonders of cell division inside embryos. This tool they have forged has enabled us to visually observe the most minuscule elements that make up life so that we may better understand it.

Make sure you tune in on the 10th to witness the celebrations as the winners of this year’s prizes officially join the ranks of the Nobel laureates. 

I hope you have a wonderful winter or, if you are in the southern hemisphere, a smashing summer ahead of you 

Cheers.

                                                                             

 



Friday, October 17, 2014

Nobel Prize 2014 : Physics Front Runners & Winners



Dear Readers 

Yes! The Nobel Prize award ceremonies are just a couple of months off and from what I hear it’s going to be dynamite! (Pardon the ill choice of words)

The prize winners were announced over the past couple of days as we gear up towards December. I decided to do a series of articles covering the Prize Categories 

But where is the controversy? You may ask. 

Well firstly there will be the controversy as to why I’m writing about this seemingly non-controversial topic thus diverging from the central theme of the blog itself.
Secondly competitions themselves are in their essence built upon controversy as people argue the question of “who is the best?” 
Thirdly, Have you seen the Nobel Prizes before? Very definition of controversy.

So without further hesitation
Here are the citations

Physics


Nominations for the Nobel Physics Prize are invitation only and are to be kept under wraps for the duration of 50 years.  But before we celebrate the winner I feel it is a must that we acknowledge some of the probable front runners in the division. In no particular order here are some of the eligible nominees:

BICEP 2 team: Residual gravitational waves from the Big Bang 

Before getting down to the real nominees, the BICEP 2 team in my humble opinion would’ve been solid competition due to the gravity of their findings (pardon the pun). 

However due to the dust up (again I do apologize, all things thrive but thrice) they had with the Planck team, results have yet to be confirmed and thus they won’t even be in the running. Fingers crossed for 2015 guys. 


Peidong Yang: Photonic Nanowire Technology 


This Chinese-born American chemist and materials scientist at University of California, Berkeley had a promising candidacy due to his contributions to nanowire photonics. 

The Thomas Reuters group seems to share this opinion as he was among their top 10 chemists of the decade and also ranked as the leading materials scientist in 2010.

Nanowires are, as their name suggests, wires with a diameter of 1 nanometer. Its quantum size offers a host of wondrous attributes unattainable by larger wires, a key trait among these being that nanowires are smaller than the wavelength of light(200-700nm) thus enabling the manipulation of optical energy. This opened up a plethora of avenues for the practical application of photonics. Scientists are conducting research on the integration of photonic nanowire technology with devices for computing, communication and sensing.  

Prof.Peidong Yang (right) and group

What earned Prof.Peidong Yang and his group a nomination was their invention of the first room- temperature UV nanowire laser in 2001, which was pumped into their synthesized zinc oxide nanowires to produce light; thereby demonstrating the very practical prospect of integrating photonic and microelectronic devices  at room temperature.   


His paper earned him over 5000 citations and was a highly qualified and worthy contender.


  

Lene Hau: Catching light


Prof. Lene Hau
On the subject of Photonics, Danish Professor Lene Hau performed the astounding feat of literally stopping a beam of light. 


In 1999, She and her team at Harvard managed to slow down light to 17 metres per second by using a Bose-Einstein Condensate (gas of bosons cooled to extreme cold, near absolute zero temperature) and in 2001 eventually  succeeded to stop it. 


The experiment saw a beam of light sent through a medium of condensated sodium atoms which exponentially reduced speeds. Newer experiments with the utilization of lasers allowed them to stop the light pulse and create a meta copy of it (essentially meaning its extinguishment) which could be manipulated and brought back into existence as a light beam. In other words this is a transformation of light into matter and back into light. 


Applications of this experiment range from quantum computing to communication through the use of photonics. For this staggering accomplishment and contribution Prof. Lene Hau is well deserving of the Nobel Prize and I see her being granted the honour in the future.


J.F.Scott: Ferroelectric memory devices
R.Ramesh & Y.Tokura: New MultiFerroic materials
            


Our second joint candidacy comes from the field of Ferroelectrics. 


Ferroelectricity refers to the ability of certain materials to create spontaneous electric polarization that can be activated and reversed
by subjecting it to an external electrical field.

This trait allows the materials to act as non-volatile memory (information stored after power is switched off) which could be read, erased and written.



Prof. James F. Scott
Professor James Scott’s groundbreaking contribution came in 1989, at the University of Colorado, when he combined a ferroelectric thin film individually to both silicon and gallium arsenide semiconductors. The outcome of which, allowed for the creation of ferroelectric integrated circuit memory that was far superior to magnetic core and bubble memory.

In addition to a Nobel prize nomination, on election to the Royal Society of London in 2008, he earned the moniker “father of integrated ferroelectrics “as citation.



 
Multiferroic materials are compounds that display more than one primary ferroic order parameters simultaneously at a given time. In regards to ferroelectrics, there are some multiferroic oxides which can be controlled both magnetically and electrically, the implications of which are going to hugely benefit future memory technology. 
 
Prof.Ramamoorthy Ramesh & Prof.Yoshinori Tokura’s research on the oxides, bismuth ferrite BiFeO3 and perovskite manganite TbMnO3  (respectively) further pushed the boundaries of Professor J.Scott’s work giving us an enhanced perception on memory, its manipulation and control and its countless applications. 

Prof.Yoshinori Tokura (left) & Prof.Ramamoorthy Ramesh (right)


All three gentlemen were strong candidates for their remarkable efforts in the field of ferroelectrics to improve memory and increase the energy efficiency of our essential electronic devices. 


C. L. Kane, L. W. Molenkamp & S. Zhang: Topological insulators


The term “Topological insulator” might ,in general English terms, seem contrary given the fact the material is an internal insulator with a conductive surface. Topology in physics pertains to an order of the state of quantum matter.

 In the case of a topological insulator, it is in a state of matter which is dubbed “
quantum spin Hall state”, wherein electrons with opposite spins group together on opposite sides of a conductor to form a semi-conductor. This effect is created due to its spin-orbit coupling and thus doesn’t require an external magnetic field. 
 

Prof.Charles L. Kane (left) & Prof. Eugene Mele (right)
Prof. Charles Kane with the assistance of Prof. Eugene Mele theorized the quantum spin hall effect and what materials would be classified as topological insulators in 2005. However their experimentation with graphene sheets, a possible proposed prospect, didn’t provide the expected results.

 

Prof. Laurens Molenkamp (left) & Prof. Shoucheng Zhang (right)
Mercury Telluride was suggested as a possible topological insulator by Prof. Shoucheng Zhang  in 2006.

It was however Prof. Laurens Molenkamp who in 2007 finally established the quantum spin hall state theory with experimental evidence.




The applications of the theory and the topological insulators themselves hold great promise and potential especially in the field of quantum computing, and for that we must acknowledge these gentlemen for their incredible contributions to science and its future. 




Super-Kamiokande Team: Neutrino oscillations 



Neutrino oscillation refers to the oscillation of a neutrino that results in it changing between its different lepton flavours/types (electron,muon and tau).





What is fascinating about these neutrino oscillations is that they contradict the Standard model of particle physics that arbitrates the dynamics and kinematics of subatomic particles. Although the conventional standard model assumed that neutrinos didn’t have a mass and most certainly didn’t oscillate the current model can account for them having masses, but obtaining the specifics still remains a challenge. 

Neutrinos are a creation of radioactive decay or nuclear reactions, such as those that can occur in nuclear reactors, the sun and cosmic rays that hit atoms. Thus research revolves around detecting, observing and measuring these neutrino oscillations from afore mentioned sources. 


Led by the late Prof.Yoji Totsuka and Prof.Takaaki Kajita, The Super-Kamiokande experiment’s focus was on atmospheric neutrino oscillation, and in 1998 provided the first evidence of neutrino oscillation.

Prof. Takaaki Kajita (left) & Prof. Yoji Totsuka (right)
It is the implications of this finding, which not only identifies the gaps and flaws of the standard model allowing leeway for amendment and an improved unified theory but also for the provision of fundamental data for future experiments and theories that demands our respect and recognition.   

 
Vera Rubin: Dark Matter


Our last but certainly not the least in any way imaginable is the astronomer who discovered dark matter. Dr. Vera Rubin had a rough begin in the sexist scientific community but never stopped reaching for the stars. It is there she discovered her greatest accomplishments. 

Her initial work examining the rotation of galaxies led her to stumble upon the galaxy rotation problem, wherein, by comparing orbital speeds of stars, she observed that the previously assumed theory of central gravitational force concentration of a spiral galaxy was false. 

Rubin and fellow staff member Kent Ford theorized that the only explanation to the problem is that there is an invisible force that is unaccounted for, dubbing it dark matter. Although Dark matter remains a vastly unexplored and controversial subject, uncovering the mere presence of it led to a new field of scientific research. 

Prof.Kent Ford (left) & Prof. Vera Rubin (right)

Although Dr. Rubin doesn’t seek the approbation of the Nobel Prize (which long eluded her for unknown reasons) I feel that it is just, to recognize her achievements and hope that she is soon welcomed into the ranks of the Nobel laureates.



The winners of 2014 Nobel Prize in Physics 


Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano & Shuji Nakamura: Blue LED light



“This year’s Nobel Laureates are rewarded for having invented a new energy-efficient and environment-friendly light source – the blue light-emitting diode (LED). In the spirit of Alfred Nobel the Prize rewards an invention of greatest benefit to mankind; using blue LEDs, white light can be created in a new way. With the advent of LED lamps we now have more long-lasting and more efficient alternatives to older light sources” ~Nobel Prize .org
 
It is fundamental knowledge that the combination of the primary colours of Red, Green and Blue create White.  Although LED technology dates back over 40 years, with the invention of Red and Green diodes, it wasn’t till the early 1990s that the elusive blue diode was developed. 


The difficulty in achieving blue LED stemmed from the intricacy of growing a high quality crystal layer of the semiconductor gallium nitride (which was pertinent for the production of blue light). 

Prof.Shuji Nakamura
Through unyielding efforts and an accidental discovery, the above commended company of gentlemen managed to accomplish the challenging task and move on to devise the long sought after blue LED, enabling the production of bright white light.   

This led to a revolution in lighting technology.

 LED bulbs are far superior to their predecessors the fluorescent bulbs, in that they are more durable, exceedingly more energy efficient (70lm/w of fluorescent to 300lm/w of LED, lm/w being luminescence per watt) and less dangerous. 

Prof.Hiroshi Amano
One fourth of the World’s energy consumption is devoted to lighting, and the global usage of LED bulbs sees an exponential and much needed economy of resources as I mentioned in a previous article.

The energy efficiency of LED bulbs integrated with solar technology will make provision for the illumination of the 20% of the world’s population that lack access to power grids. Another application is water sterilization utilizing UV LEDs derived from blue light LED.


Asaki, Amano and Nakamura also created the first blue laser by using a sand grain sized Blue LED, the real world applications of which ranged from the creation of the Blu-ray player to Environmental monitoring using diode-laser-based spectroscopy to Maglev technology and many more.

Prof. Isamu Akasaki

It is due to the countless contributions of blue LED to other areas of technology that earn it and the team its deserving Nobel Prize. 

Don't agree with the list or have a nomination of your own?

Please leave a piece of your mind below.

Stay tuned at the edge of your seats for the next episode on the frontrunners for the 2014 Nobel Medicine and Physiology Prize.....coming soon to an internet-friendly device near you.